Battlestar Gallactica Vs. Wonder Showzen: Tacky Art Battle Royale (May 2006)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8742/c8742bd07d40fe5f9a77726b5cedbabf230cd54a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44a8c/44a8cc886f699cc350b83ca0013907e4871dd727" alt=""
People say that you can't compare apples and oranges. These shows are completely different. Well if you ask me, they're both shows... And are not apples and oranges both fruit? Exactly.
The 'Bacon or patio chairs?' fight is one I'll stay out of, but the merit of worth of these two seemingly diametrically opposed television shows connects on a level that is everything good television is about: Art.
Having seen both the First Season of Battlestar Gallactica as well as the First Season of Wonder Showzen, I think I'll try to decide which is better artistically, which deserves to stay on the air, you know, like if I had a gun to my head...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/655b3/655b37cb7fccb7319f8742aa5399326e4d1be9da" alt=""
He said, "It's not art unless it costs over $20,000." No shit. What a douchebag.
Why must American television be like the American consumer? Just because a show has a budget does not mean it's automatically better. In fact, the more money there is, the more people are involved. The more people involved in production, the more originality becomes a smorgasbord of normalcy. No. Granted, Battlestar Gallactica spends it's money wisely, but Wonder Showzen delivers us the feel of the 70s children's show regardless of what little money it has.
The cash category gets a draw.
Hitchcock said that he made 'art for the masses'. Some said that he was selling out from his artistic penchant, debasing his ideals for the crowd. Others said that it was proof of his artistry, since it appealed to a greater audience because he knew what people liked, acceptability rather than snobbery. I'll say here that Battlestar Gallactica, though original, does not take chances.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91c2f/91c2f7508b8005dc80b0c1969077fc0d8b58f619" alt=""
I would have said that peaks and valleys versus smooth sailing would give us another draw, but Wonder Showzen has insinuated itself into my head so completely that I can no longer say that. One point for the Showzen.
Many of you will disagree with my final conclusion. These two programs are so different that many of you should, and by all means write your comments, but after all is said and done, I'll beg and pray that Wonder Showzen wins the longest number of seasons fight. Today, both shows are in their second, so they're neck and neck, but I suspect that Battlestar will win it in the end, due to the Lowest Common Denominator Factor.
I, myself, am more surrealist than realist. I like art that pushes the boundaries. The other reason I hope Wonder Showzen wins is that shows like Battlestar Gallactica will always be around, we know that television is moving in a more realistic and less melodramatic direction, so Wonder Showzen is clearly the underdog in this case. There's very few shows like it, and this has to stick around, in hopes that others pick up something as daring and innovative.
It's terrific, they're both terrific. This is some of the best television out there, which sadly, isn't saying much.
<< Home